Judge Denies Long Delay of Bribery Case in Test of Trump Order

A federal judge said he won’t allow a prolonged delay of a bribery trial following President Donald Trump’s order putting a pause to enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. 

Judge Michael Farbiarz in New Jersey on Tuesday denied a request for a 180-day delay to a case against two former Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. executives in what may be the first test for Trump’s executive order. He ruled that the trial start no later than April 7. 

The case is among several that have experienced upheaval because of Trump’s executive order that calls for a halt to enforcement of the anti-bribery law while Attorney General Pam Bondi conducts a review. Trump has criticized the statute because he says it hurts American companies that try to do business in other countries. 

On Feb. 21, prosecutors in the Cognizant Technology case said they were ready to proceed to trial because the government had already conducted a review as required by Trump’s order. But last week, a new interim US attorney in New Jersey requested a 180-day delay to consider how Trump’s executive order applies.

Farbiarz wrote that it was unnecessary to wait for Bondi to review all FCPA cases before the Cognizant Technology trial could move forward. 

“It is apparent that the Attorney General is actively reviewing certain cases and coming to conclusions about them, before completing her broader Executive Order review of all of the Nation’s FCPA cases,” he wrote. 

The former Cognizant Technology executives, Gordon Coburn and Steven Schwartz, were charged during the first Trump administration with approving a $2 million payoff to secure a construction permit for a new building in India. 

A spokesperson for Schwartz and an attorney for Coburn declined to comment. The DOJ couldn’t be immediately reached.

The FCPA, which was enacted in 1977, bars a company or person with US links to pay or offer gifts to foreign officials as a way to win business overseas. More than 40 other countries have adopted similar regulations. While Trump criticized the law during his first term, the DOJ still filed dozens of cases between 2017 and 2021.

This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

  • Aniket Pujari

    Aniket Pujari

    Aniket Pujari, a graduate in Financial Markets, is the founder of Minute To Know News, a digital platform providing daily news updates on cryptocurrencies, finance, and economics. With a passion for finance and technology, Aniket has been exploring the world of cryptocurrencies since 2015, building a deep understanding of these rapidly evolving industries.

    Related Posts

    Rebel Foods to boost Wendy’s India presence with ₹150 crore investment

    New Delhi: Rebel Foods will invest ₹100-150 crore to help Wendy’s, the American burger chain, expand its footprint in India to 500 locations by 2028. The Wendy’s Company plans to add…

    Adobe seeks to sell lawsuit-free AI models, expands Indian engineering hub

    While lawsuits against AI models and Big Tech firms build up in India and globally for alleged copyright violations, California-headquartered visual illustration and editing software developer Adobe remains unperturbed as…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    South Korea sets timeline to finalize path for institutional crypto deals

    South Korea sets timeline to finalize path for institutional crypto deals

    Amazon, Google and Meta support tripling nuclear power by 2050

    Sensex, Nifty 50 end lower but recover as banks support late rebound after IT-led selloff

    Need for Speed – Only Ultra-Fast Blockchains Will Win the Adoption Race (Opinion)

    Need for Speed – Only Ultra-Fast Blockchains Will Win the Adoption Race (Opinion)

    5 Ways to Get Your Tax Return Faster

    5 Ways to Get Your Tax Return Faster

    Sensex, Nifty 50 end lower; mid, small-caps underperform— 10 key highlights of stock market today